The fresh article by Ichak Adizes "Change and Its Repercussions for The Banking Industry"  tells us about fast changes which concern each part of our life. The domino effect means if one economic field change, many others will be affected and so changes penetrate the whole field of our reality.

 Changes in fast growing industries as Internet trade are expectable: we all want more convenient, modern, simple, pleasant shopping. So it works for good and we can accept the result with pleasure, having own experience to compare with. Education processes are changing too. I love it in the way knowledge comes to each person by MOOC. For example that way I`ve completed "The Age of Sustainable development" course and now waiting for the certificate. The way knowledge develop is new with fresh ideas and fast delivery, so we can touch the benefits by our own.

Another case is for institutions which are expected to be more stable, such as banking and investment. We all want our finance safe and expect from banking system high level of  risks control. So the banking industry expected to be more conservative as it concerns so vital things. However the fast changes affect it drastically. So banks must change just to fulfill our expectations to have access to safe bank products.

Such a contradiction!  Somehow we are living with it.

The question: how to be adjustable for changes and how to remain core values, such as safety of our resourses includes health, finance, social connections, time. We are asking for the best results, isn`t it?

The point is we need smart decision for it. We need smart way to make quick analysis also. Let`s reveal some points for it.

The world is changing with several natural laws which we can understand and apply in order to check what`s going on. Changes are multifaceted and multidisciplinary. Also it runs being interconnected. It needs to be applied as well as it possible. So this is the points to analyse, is changes real and could provide us with future, of changes are just a noisy trembling to gather our attention without solid results. This is the quick analysis about gather or scatter of resourses.

If changes in service or a product became more multifaceted, multidisciplinary, interconnected and applied, it seems more likely to help us to gather our resourses.

If changes became flat, artificially simplified, low connected and outlay resourses without applied result, it seems changes are dissipative and more likely destructive. Such changes happen in several branches of arts.

Another analysis concerns SMM (social media marketing). In that field the result connects with galvanizing of an audience, so the trembling activities with "likes" and fast food content which attracts peoples attention work for profit of the seller who organized it. Such social changes seems to be more targeted to the audience in order to catch it strong and keep it involved. We should analyse content of an activity to reveal what`s the aim, what`s a result.

Conclusion:

The whole system are changing without syncronisity. So we need to provide own sustainability in order to have better orientation and so provide ourselves with better results.

Also we can make a quick analysis to check important points of current changes and to make own decisions in better way.

Read the full article by Dr.Adizes in his blog www.ichakadizes.com/change-and-its-repercussions-for-the-banking-industry/