#9 Point of Corporate Lifecycle: the Bureacracy point
Author:
ANNAmain • Date: 20 December 2013 at 05:03 PM
No comments •
Hello friends, Today I would like to present you "Bureacracy point" painting
Transition from .jpg)
to 
Is easy.
When I investigated inner space of human fears it was a special one presented in many horrible movies.
It includes several typical characters represents in all human sosieties as an Archetypes.
Living mummies. Ghosts.Zombie.
The worstn nightmares I used saw.
It was an interesting question why it was so scaring.
Many evil creatures represents in Archetypes (and movies) are much more powerful. Verwolfs, devils, demons, war creatures are not so scaring being much more powerful and destructive.
Whait is the reason?
I had that question and I founded the answer.
Active evil represents life. It can be an evil life, with strange habits, but the main characters is the same as for normal life (eating, greed, emotions, desires, plans). It put such active creatures on the high rank of hierarchy. Sometimes they seems so natural so people associates with them (as in new film about vampires "Twilight"). Sometimes such evil creatures looks like just in one step from everyday people.
But zombie etc are another case.
It`s passive. It`s unnatural. Something, not Somebody.
This is the border. This is the cold horror. It is so un-natural so occupies the low positions in hierarchy.
This is something broken deeply inside, spirit gone, but still moving, still trying to rule, trying to make influence to the living world.
This is Bureacracy.
Such intervention is mechanical. Pretending to be functional it is an imitation by nature. It "lives" using real living energy but make nothing in return. Zombie use living energy just for itself, to feed own moves and no more. So zombie is enthropy without reason, without target. It use energy for nothing. And it still has human-like shape so it could be a moppet to more high hierarchy creatures, not good of cource. Active evil power could use it. From the other hand normal living creatures hardly able to have benefits from zombie systems.
Because zombie systems eat energy from living by cloak of a legal service.
It can`t be an appropriate service because of it`s nature: to use living energy to support own anti-life.
Traditionally people pay attention to active evil. But passive evil is more dengerous sometimes. No symptoms, no pain so no reason to ask a question about desease. Desease is energy loss like AIDS. It is not Death but Dying.
This is the process which can be more long and much more destructive then pure honour death.
In compare with previous paintings you can see no living anargy here. No living Yellow colours. No movements.
Dark, dust, enervate. But still formally powerful.
Still with authority.
Still covering by past trust.
Sometimes it covers itself by good ideas and masks.
In the worst this is (A) power of concentration camp.
This is the most scaring point in the LifeCycle.
One great psychology experiment proves how passive "zombie" behaviour can be produced by special circumstances in normal people.
For example Stanford prison experiment (SPE) by Dr.P.Zimbardo represents how passive obeying produce an active evil http://www.prisonexp.org/ . Participants were recruited and told they would participate in a two-week prison simulation. Out of 70 respondents, Zimbardo and his team selected the 24 males whom they deemed to be the most psychologically stable and healthy.
The guards and prisoners adapted to their roles more than they were expected, stepping beyond the boundaries of what had been predicted, leading to dangerous and psychologically damaging situations. After C.Maslach confronted Zimbardo (the creator of (A) rules of the Experiment) and forced him to realize that he had been passively allowing unethical acts to be performed under his supervision, Zimbardo concluded that both prisoners and guards had become grossly absorbed in their roles and realized that he had likewise become as grossly absorbed in his own, and he terminated the experiment.
It was the evidence how (A) rules creates the worst situation and most destructive roles even for normal people.
More or less rigid cases of Beaurocracy represents everywhere in normal life. It is so invitingly to forget it so it needs more historical, philosophy and cultural tools to understand what is the problems of that point of corporate LifeCycle.
Thank you for being with me,
sincerely
Anna
